Incorporating a Holistic Process into Graduate Admission Reviews

Often quantitative metrics (ie GRE scores and GPA) are a primary focus of graduate application review, particularly in STEM fields.  However, evidence has shown that the GRE scores are a poor predictor of success¹ in graduate school and college GPA has become less reliable due to increased grade inflation, which is more prevalent at private institutions.²    Not only does this practice overlook valuable indicators regarding student preparedness and potential success, it also has potential biases and can prevent underrepresented groups from gaining access to PhD programs.  A holistic graduate application review is one strategy for improving diversity in PhD programs.³   This type of review includes non-cognitive or “success critical” skills.⁴ This presentation will summarize current research on quantitative and holistic processes and give an overview implementing a holistic review process at your institution.

 

¹Miller, C., Stassun, K. “A test that fails.” Nature 510, 303–304 (2014).

²Aina Katsikas. “Same Performance, Better Grades.” The Atlantic (2015).

³Council of Graduate Schools. (2019)  Holistic Review in Graduate Admissions

⁴Sedlacek, W. E. (2004) Why we should use noncognitive variables with graduate and professional students. The Advisor: The Journal of the National Association of Advisors for the Health Professions. 24 (2), 32-39 3