Evaluating the Residual Kinetic Energy in Direct-Drive Cryogenic Implosions on OMEGA

ORAL

Abstract

Efficient conversion of the shell kinetic energy to the hot-spot thermal energy is an essential requirement in inertial confinement fusion implosions. The spectral moments of the neutron energy distribution emitted from a fusing deuterium–tritium (DT) plasma is used to infer the yield, mean energy, and neutron averaged ion temperature of the implosion. Flows in the reacting plasma will have a different effect on the DD and DT neutron distribution, resulting in a disagreement between the inferred ion temperatures from the two separate reactions. Enhanced broadening of the peak distributions of the different reactants provides a measure of the residual kinetic energy in the fusion plasma.[1] Evaluation of residual kinetic energy from direct-drive cryogenic DT implosions on OMEGA is presented.

[1] T. J. Murphy, Phys. Plasmas 21, 072701 (2014).

Presenters

  • Chad J. Forrest

    Lab for Laser Energetics, Univ of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics U. of Rochester, Lab for Laser Energetics, Univ of Rochester, University of Rochester

Authors

  • Chad J. Forrest

    Lab for Laser Energetics, Univ of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics U. of Rochester, Lab for Laser Energetics, Univ of Rochester, University of Rochester

  • Ken S Anderson

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics U. of Rochester, Lab for Laser Energetics

  • Vladimir Yu Glebov

    Lab for Laser Energetics, Univ of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics U. of Rochester, University of Rochester

  • Valeri N Goncharov

    Univ of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics U. of Rochester, University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester, Lab for Laser Energetics

  • James P Knauer

    University of Rochester

  • Owen M Mannion

    University of Rochester

  • Radha Bahukutumbi

    Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics U. of Rochester, University of Rochester, Univ of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester, Lab for Laser Energetics, Univ of Rochester

  • Sean P Regan

    Univ of Rochester, Univ of Rochester, Univ of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics U. of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Rochester, New York, University of Rochester, Lab for Laser Energetics

  • Rahul C Shah

    Lab for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester, Lab for Laser Energetics, Univ of Rochester

  • Christian Stoeckl

    Univ of Rochester, Univ of Rochester, Univ of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Laboratory for Laser Energetics U. of Rochester, Lab for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester