Internal transport barrier dynamics at high poloidal beta on DIII-D and extensions towards high confinement scenarios for a fusion reactor

ORAL

Abstract

Towards the ITER steady-state goal of Q=5, recent DIII-D/EAST joint experiments on DIII-D have demonstrated sustainment of excellent energy confinement quality (H98y2>1.5) via a large radius ITB at high normalized beta (βN~3.5) and reactor-relevant q95~6.0. At high βP (>2), the large Shafranov shift can stabilize turbulence and create a bifurcation in kinetic ballooning mode (KBM) transport at large minor radius, leading to an improved confinement state. Large transient perturbations such as type-I ELMs can trigger this transition from the H-mode confinement state with a high edge pedestal to the higher confinement state with a lower pedestal and an ITB. At lower βp (≤2), negative magnetic shear in the plasma core contributes to turbulence suppression and can compensate for reduced Shafranov shift to still produce a large radius ITB and excellent confinement with low plasma rotation, consistent with results of gyrofluid transport simulations. However, resistive wall modes can be a limitation at simultaneous high βN, low internal inductance, and low rotation. Additional off-axis external current drive will further provide a more stable path towards operation at reduced q95.

Presenters

  • Juan Huang

    ASIPP

Authors

  • Juan Huang

    ASIPP

  • Xianzu Gong

    Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, ASIPP, Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 1126, Hefei, Anhui 230031, People’s Republic of China

  • Jinping Qian

    ASIPP

  • Siye Ding

    ORAU/ASIPP, ORAU/ASIPP, ASIPP

  • Wenfeng Guo

    ASIPP

  • Chengkang Pan

    ASIPP

  • Muquan Wu

    Advanced Energy Research Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China, Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Prov, Advanced Energy Research Center, Shenzhen University, Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and System of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelec, Advanced Energy Research Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, People’s Republic of China, ASIPP

  • Guoqiang Li

    Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China, ASIPP, Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Hefei, Anhui, 230031, P.R. China, the Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China, Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 1126, Hefei, Anhui 230031, People’s Republic of China

  • Qilong Ren

    ASIPP

  • Andrea MV Garofalo

    General Atomics - San Diego, General Atomics

  • David B Weisberg

    General Atomics, General Atomics - San Diego

  • Alan W Hyatt

    General Atomics - San Diego, GA

  • John Roderick Ferron

    General Atomics, General Atomics - San Diego, GA

  • Edward J Strait

    GA, General Atomics - San Diego, General Atomics

  • Robert I Pinsker

    General Atomics - San Diego, GA, General Atomics, CA, USA, General Atomics

  • Gary M Staebler

    GA, General Atomics - San Diego

  • Lang Li Lao

    General Atomics, General Atomics - San Diego

  • Joseph McClenaghan

    ORAU, General Atomics - San Diego

  • Christopher T Holcomb

    Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, LLNL

  • George R Mckee

    Univ of Wisconsin, Madison, Univ of Wisconsin, Madison, Univ of Wisconsin, Madison, University of Wisconsin–Madison, University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Wisconsin - Madison, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison

  • Zheng Yan

    Univ of Wisconsin, Madison, University of Wisconsin–Madison, University of Wisconsin - Madison, University of Wisconsin, Madison

  • Terry L Rhodes

    Univ of California - Los Angeles, University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA, University of California Los Angeles