An Experiment to Tame the Plasma Material Interface

POSTER

Abstract

Approaches to heat flux handling and tritium retention that may work for ITER do not generally extrapolate to Demo, and certain ITER parameters, such as first-wall temperature and loss power / major radius do not approach those of Demo. Thus research will be required in parallel with ITER to bridge the gap to Demo. A series of key questions sets the requirements for the research capabilities of a device fill this gap, such as heating power / major radius, flexibility in poloidal field configuration, plasma facing component flexibility in materials (solid and liquid) and in temperature, plasma pulse length, and access for surface and plasma diagnostics.

Authors

  • R.J. Goldston

    PPPL

  • J.E. Menard

    PPPL, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

  • J.P. Allain

    Purdue University, Purdue

  • J.N. Brooks

    Purdue

  • J. Canik

    ORNL, Oak Ridge National Lab

  • R. Doerner

    UCSD

  • A. Hassanein

    Purdue

  • M. Kotschenreuther

    Institute for Fusion Studies, U. Texas, University of Texas - Austin, Institute for Fusion Studies

  • G.J. Kramer

    PPPL

  • H. Kugel

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • R. Maingi

    ORNL, Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • S.M. Mahajan

    U. Texas

  • R. Majeski

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • C.L. Neumeyer

    PPPL

  • R.E. Nygren

    SNL

  • L.W. Owen

    ORNL

  • T.D. Rognlien

    LLNL

  • D.N. Ruzic

    U. Ill.

  • D.D. Ryutov

    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551, LLNL

  • S.A. Sabbagh

    Columbia U., Columbia, Columbia University

  • C.H. Skinner

    Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, PPPL

  • V. Soukhanovskii

    LLNL

  • Michael Ulrickson

    SNL, Sandia National Labs

  • P.M. Valanju

    Institute for Fusion Studies, U. Texas

  • R.D. Woolley

    PPPL