Towards Precise and Accurate Calculations of Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay
ORAL · Invited
Abstract
I present the contents of a report (arXiv:2207.01085) emerging from a National Science Foundation Project Scoping
Workshop that took place early this year. The report articulates the challenges for
the computation of double-beta nuclear matrix elements from first principles
with controlled uncertainty and lays out a road-map for the execution of the computations. After briefly reviewing crucial developments in
effective field theory, lattice quantum chromodynamics, and ab initio nuclear
many-body theory, I describe a program to improve each, connect them in
a first-principles computation, and determine the uncertainty in the resulting
double-beta matrix elements. The uncertainty quantification will combine an
assessment of correlations between double-beta rates and other observables with
Bayesian model mixing. The correlation analysis will feed back into the
Hamiltonians and operators in the nuclear computations, leading ultimately
to matrix elements that are both accurate and precise.
Workshop that took place early this year. The report articulates the challenges for
the computation of double-beta nuclear matrix elements from first principles
with controlled uncertainty and lays out a road-map for the execution of the computations. After briefly reviewing crucial developments in
effective field theory, lattice quantum chromodynamics, and ab initio nuclear
many-body theory, I describe a program to improve each, connect them in
a first-principles computation, and determine the uncertainty in the resulting
double-beta matrix elements. The uncertainty quantification will combine an
assessment of correlations between double-beta rates and other observables with
Bayesian model mixing. The correlation analysis will feed back into the
Hamiltonians and operators in the nuclear computations, leading ultimately
to matrix elements that are both accurate and precise.
–
Publication: arXiv:2207.01085
Presenters
-
Jonathan H Engel
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina at Chapel H
Authors
-
Jonathan H Engel
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina at Chapel H
-
Witold Nazarewicz
Michigan State University
-
Daniel R Phillips
Ohio University