Increasing gain and dynamic range for active-target time-projection chambers

ORAL

Abstract

Active-target time-projection chambers (TPCs) use the unique concept of using the tracking medium of the detector simultaneously as the target for studying nuclear reactions. This gives them the advantage of providing a thick target without losing resolution and a large acceptance for reaction products. However target gases for active-target TPCs such as H$_2$ and $^4$He have less favorable properties as compared to standard TPC gases, e.g. a lower maximum gain before sparking. Another difficulty is dealing with the broad range of possible recoil energies and particles resulting in a large span of energy losses. To overcome these difficulties, we tested two new methods using the MICROMEGAS electron amplification device. To handle the large energy loss dynamics, some MICROMEGAS' anode pads were polarized with a HV bias, resulting in different gains. This allows some pads to track high-energy loss particles such as high-Z ions while the others can track lower-energy loss particles such as energetic protons. For increasing the maximum gas gain, we doped the target gas with allene, which can increase the MICROMEGAS charge output by producing a larger number of ionized electrons through allene's conversion of UV radiation to free electrons.

Authors

  • Tan Ahn

    NSCL, Michigan State University, National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (Michigan State University)

  • Wolfgang Mittig

    NSCL, Michigan State University, National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (Michigan State University)

  • Malek Tahar

    NSCL, Michigan State University, National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (Michigan State University)

  • Remi Becquet

    NSCL, Michigan State University, National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (Michigan State University)

  • Daniel Bazin

    NSCL, Michigan State University, National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (Michigan State University), NSCL

  • Saul Beceiro

    NSCL, Michigan State University, National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (Michigan State University)

  • Zbigniew Chajecki

    NSCL, Michigan State University, National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (Michigan State University)

  • Adam Fritsch

    NSCL, Michigan State University, National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (Michigan State University)

  • Jim Kolata

    Notre Dame University, University of Notre Dame

  • W.G. Lynch

    NSCL, Michigan State University, National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (Michigan State University), Michigan State University

  • Aimee Shore

    NSCL, Michigan State University, National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (Michigan State University)