Is Turbulence Anisotropy the missig ingredient in classical atmospheric surface layer turbulence theory?
ORAL
Abstract
Traditionally, land-atmosphere turbulent exchanges of momentum, energy, and mass, are interpreted through Monin-Obukhov similarity theory (MOST). Based on dimensional analysis, MOST states that for high Reynolds number flows, in the absence of mean downward vertical flow, steady-state conditions, and horizontal homogeneity, turbulence is dictated by the balance between shear and buoyancy production/destruction, represented by a single non-dimensional length scale, ζ. Thus, based on MOST, any mean quantity θ representing the land-atmosphere turbulent exchanges, when properly non-dimensionalized with the respective turbulent scaling variable θ*, can be expressed as a universal function φ of the scaling parameter ζ, such that θ/θ* ∼ φ(ζ). The specific functional forms of the scaling relations φ have been obtained experimentally by curve fitting through years of experimental campaigns. These relations are widely used in atmospheric surface layer parametrizations for most Earth System Models of different scales.
However MOST suffers from significant failures that limit its applicability like the lack of scaling of horizontal velocity variances under unstable thermal stratification, the non-scaling of surface-normal velocity and temperature variances in stable stratification, as well as the general breakdown of scaling for intermittent turbulence. Furthermore, MOST also fails in representing land-atmosphere turbulent exchanges over perturbed surfaces (e.g. heterogeneous landscapes, complex terrain, etc.), where the original MOST assumptions breakdown. It has now been long hypothesized the need for an additional non-dimensional parameter that is able to encapsulate the missing information. In this work, we suggest using the metric of turbulence anisotropy as a remedy for generalizing the representation of near surface turbulent exchanges over perturbed surface conditions. To demonstrate its potential, we use an unprecedented set of atmospheric datasets representative of a wide range of different surface and flow conditions. The resulting novel scaling relations not only offer a path-forward in addressing a 70-year old problem in ABL meteorology, but also provide a deeper understanding of turbulence, and its role in the surface-atmosphere exchange over realistic terrain.
However MOST suffers from significant failures that limit its applicability like the lack of scaling of horizontal velocity variances under unstable thermal stratification, the non-scaling of surface-normal velocity and temperature variances in stable stratification, as well as the general breakdown of scaling for intermittent turbulence. Furthermore, MOST also fails in representing land-atmosphere turbulent exchanges over perturbed surfaces (e.g. heterogeneous landscapes, complex terrain, etc.), where the original MOST assumptions breakdown. It has now been long hypothesized the need for an additional non-dimensional parameter that is able to encapsulate the missing information. In this work, we suggest using the metric of turbulence anisotropy as a remedy for generalizing the representation of near surface turbulent exchanges over perturbed surface conditions. To demonstrate its potential, we use an unprecedented set of atmospheric datasets representative of a wide range of different surface and flow conditions. The resulting novel scaling relations not only offer a path-forward in addressing a 70-year old problem in ABL meteorology, but also provide a deeper understanding of turbulence, and its role in the surface-atmosphere exchange over realistic terrain.
–
Publication: doi = 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.124001
Presenters
-
Marc Calaf
University of Utah
Authors
-
Marc Calaf
University of Utah
-
Ivana Stiperski
University of Innsbruck