Comparison of Quasi-Conservative Pressure-Based and Fully-Conservative Formulations for the Simulation of Transcritical Flows

High-pressure flows are known to be challenging to simulate due to thermodynamic non-linearities occurring in the vicinity of the pseudo-boiling line. This study investigates the origin of this issue by analyzing the behavior of thermodynamic processes at elevated pressure and low temperature. We show that under transcritical conditions, non-linearities significantly amplify numerical errors associated with construction of fluxes. These errors affect the local density and energy balances, which in turn creates pressure oscillations. For that reason, solvers based on a conservative system of equations that transport density and total energy are subject to unphysical pressure variations in gradient regions. These perturbations hinder numerical stability and degrade the accuracy of predictions. To circumvent this problem, the governing system can be reformulated to a pressure-based treatment of energy. We present comparisons between the pressure-based and fully conservative formulations using a progressive set of canonical cases, including a cryogenic turbulent mixing layer at rocket engine conditions.