APS Logo

A quantum network of entangled optical atomic clocks

ORAL

Abstract

Optical atomic clocks are our most precise tools to measure time and frequency. They enable precision frequency comparisons between atoms in separate locations to probe the space-time variation of fundamental constants, the properties of dark matter, and for geodesy. Measurements on independent systems are limited by the standard quantum limit (SQL); measurements on entangled systems, in contrast, can surpass the SQL to reach the ultimate precision allowed by quantum theory - the so-called Heisenberg limit. While local entangling operations have been used to demonstrate this enhancement at microscopic distances, frequency comparisons between remote atomic clocks require rapid high-fidelity entanglement between separate systems that have no intrinsic interactions. We demonstrate the first quantum network of entangled optical clocks [1] using two 88Sr+ ions separated by a macroscopic distance (2 m), that are entangled using a photonic link. We characterise the entanglement enhancement for frequency comparisons between the ions. We find that entanglement reduces the measurement uncertainty by a factor close to √2, as predicted for the Heisenberg limit, thus halving the number of measurements required to reach a given precision. Practically, today's optical clocks are typically limited by laser dephasing; in this regime, we find that using entangled clocks confers an even greater benefit, yielding a factor 4 reduction in the number of measurements compared to conventional correlation spectroscopy techniques. As a proof of principle, we demonstrate this enhancement for measuring a frequency shift applied to one of the clocks. Our results show that quantum networks have now attained sufficient maturity for enhanced metrology. This two-node network could be extended to additional nodes, to other species of trapped particles, or to larger entangled systems via local operations.



[1] arXiv:2111.10336

Publication: arXiv:2111.10336

Presenters

  • Raghavendra Srinivas

    University of Oxford

Authors

  • Raghavendra Srinivas

    University of Oxford

  • Bethan C Nichol

    University of Oxford

  • David P Nadlinger

    University of Oxford

  • Peter Drmota

    University of Oxford

  • Dougal Main

    University of Oxford

  • Gabriel Araneda

    University of Oxford

  • Chris J Ballance

    University of Oxford, Department of Physics, University of Oxford

  • David M Lucas

    University of Oxford