Comparison of Quantum Entangling Gates for Ions in Penning and RF Paul Traps
ORAL
Abstract
Trapped ions have high gate fidelities making them a leading platform for quantum simulation and computation. Entangling gates are typically performed using a Mølmer-Sørensen or light-shift geometric phase gate. In our Penning trap, we have performed quantum simulations on crystals of hundreds of ions using the light-shift gate because of the difficulty of spanning our 124 GHz qubit splitting in 9Be+ at 4.5 T. One advantage of the Mølmer-Sørensen gate, however, is that it can be configured such that the motion of the ions is less sensitive to the optical phase difference between the driving laser beams. It can therefore be used to improve sensing applications and drive gates in 3-D crystals of up to 105 ions.
Spontaneous emission has limited our previous work. We show theoretically that in the high-field regime, the two gates perform comparably well. We also examine how detuning the laser beams between the Zeeman levels in the P3/2 manifold at high fields enables us to improve upon operations with detuning between the P1/2 and P3/2 manifolds and explore if this protocol can be extended to lower fields. Finally, we compare the possible fidelity of entangling gates in high and low magnetic fields.
Spontaneous emission has limited our previous work. We show theoretically that in the high-field regime, the two gates perform comparably well. We also examine how detuning the laser beams between the Zeeman levels in the P3/2 manifold at high fields enables us to improve upon operations with detuning between the P1/2 and P3/2 manifolds and explore if this protocol can be extended to lower fields. Finally, we compare the possible fidelity of entangling gates in high and low magnetic fields.
–
Presenters
-
Allison L Carter
National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, JQI, University of Maryland, College Park, NIST/CU Boulder
Authors
-
Allison L Carter
National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, JQI, University of Maryland, College Park, NIST/CU Boulder
-
Jennifer F Lilieholm
National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder
-
Bryce B Bullock
National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder
-
Matthew J Affolter
National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder
-
John J Bollinger
National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder